![]() I do not believe that the software recognized these as birds. The 2x upscale has significantly more detail than the original or upscale from Luminar 4. Viewed at 100%, things shift in favor of Gigapixel AI. I do not have a problem with the noise and actually believe it adds more to the photos. I actually like the results from Luminar 4 better because they preserve more detail. JPEG upscaled to 2500 px and exported from Luminar 4Ģx output from Gigapixel AI with the best settings (Art, 100 deblur, 0 noise reduction)Īt normal viewing size, all images look close to each other. ![]() The crops do not match exactly but it doesn't bother me.ġ:1 crop of the 16MP RAW file, processed in Luminar 4 I also used the Art setting because the default Standard setting introduced weird artefacts, as did the others. The blur reduction improved sharpness and I wanted to keep noise to preserve detail as far as possible. A 4x upscale in Gigapixel AI with the same settings as 3.For me, that meant using the 'Art' algorithm with 100 blur reduction and 0 noise reduction A 1:1 crop of the original RAW, scaled up 2x in Gigapixel AI to best results.The same JPEG as above, scaled up to 2500 px on the long edge in Luminar 4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |